Got to see The Phantom of the Opera tonight with a bunch of good people, preceded by spectacularly yummy pear, gorgonzola, and greens pizza at California Pizza Kitchen. Very good company:
cathijosephine,
mrpet,
docorion,
cathijosephine’s LJ-bereft friend C. who actually got us the tickets for cheap, C.’s sweetie D., and
eisa and
buxom_bey, which latter two met us at the theater after dinner.
I didn’t feel all that excited about the performance itself, but it was a wonderful experience all the same. The Opera House is physically, visually impressive in its ornate beauty; I’m glad places like that still exist and are still being maintained. The play also had a lot of ornate beauty and pageantry to it.
I definitely want to see more theater. And this made me want to see a more classical opera. I don’t like recorded opera music, but I think I’d enjoy it live.
I feel like I’ve got lots more to say, but I also feel like I should have been in bed hours ago. :-)
I didn’t feel all that excited about the performance itself, but it was a wonderful experience all the same. The Opera House is physically, visually impressive in its ornate beauty; I’m glad places like that still exist and are still being maintained. The play also had a lot of ornate beauty and pageantry to it.
I definitely want to see more theater. And this made me want to see a more classical opera. I don’t like recorded opera music, but I think I’d enjoy it live.
I feel like I’ve got lots more to say, but I also feel like I should have been in bed hours ago. :-)
A non-opera buff's guide to opera ...
Date: 2005-04-04 14:47 (UTC)The visual spectacle is key, I really went for the staging, sets and acting. What made it a great experience was when I recognized the music, filtered as it's become through mass culture and advertising. (I can't *tell* you how funny it was to discover that most of the music in Carmen was known to me from an episode of Gilligan's Island ... and Warner Brothers/Bugs Bunny cartoons are another topic entirely.)
It all depends on who's in it and who's directing it of course, but I think you'd rarely go wrong with anything by Verdi or Mozart. La Traviata is a good one, and you won't be able to stop humming "The Drinking Song." You need to be careful with Wagner, it can be great or a real dud. And there's always Gilbert and Sullivan for a good time, depending on whether or not you consider it opera. (I don't care, it's always funny. :)
In Edmonton the opera had a great sub-titling system. You could hear the rhythms of the original language, and read just enough to keep up with the story. I don't know if they have the same system here, but I hope so. Really juicy melodramatic opera sounds dignified when sung in the original, but kinda silly when translated into English.
If you ever need an opera buddy, you know who to call! :)
Re: A non-opera buff's guide to opera ...
Date: 2005-04-04 15:20 (UTC)Re: A non-opera buff's guide to opera ...
Date: 2005-04-04 15:29 (UTC)Re: A non-opera buff's guide to opera ...
Date: 2005-04-05 03:38 (UTC)Re: A non-opera buff's guide to opera ...
Date: 2005-04-04 16:40 (UTC)What she meant was, "You know you can always call
Re: A non-opera buff's guide to opera ...
Date: 2005-04-04 16:49 (UTC)Re: A non-opera buff's guide to opera ...
Date: 2005-04-04 19:54 (UTC)Re: A non-opera buff's guide to opera ...
Date: 2005-04-04 21:11 (UTC)Big sleepy yawn now. :-)