![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Amina A. has posted a couple very interesting speculations about what a democratic Syria would look like.
After Assad Goes: 1. Inside Syria tries to answer the question “What do the protesters want?” and comes up with a fairly optimistic answer.
After Assad 2: Beyond our Borders (which I’ve only read about half of and very quickly skimmed the rest, since
plumtreeblossom and I are trying to get out the door to get to EarthFest on the Esplanade) talks about how a democratic Syria would look to its neighbours (short answer, “Terrifying!”). This is really interesting, and I think these issues are part of why the U.S. has been (even) slower and more tentative about supporting the Syrian protesters than it was about supporting the Egyptian ones. As important as Egypt is in the region, it’s (very large) influence was fairly simple and straightforward.¹ Syria, though, has complex and far-reaching unpredictable tentacles in all sorts of nearby countries — and moreover, nearby countries have complex and far-reaching and unpredictable tentacles in it, too!
¹ To my untrained, not particularly well informed eye, anyway. Of course Egyptian foreign policy has changed in some important ways since the revolution, too.
After Assad Goes: 1. Inside Syria tries to answer the question “What do the protesters want?” and comes up with a fairly optimistic answer.
After Assad 2: Beyond our Borders (which I’ve only read about half of and very quickly skimmed the rest, since
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
¹ To my untrained, not particularly well informed eye, anyway. Of course Egyptian foreign policy has changed in some important ways since the revolution, too.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-22 03:31 (UTC)Perhaps one reason why this may be a bit hidden is that Syria, with relatively little influence, relies a lot more on "hard" power - they host and fund various militarist groups around the region, for example. Egypt has a lot more "soft" power, which is both more complicated and more influential, and runs much deeper, along streams of money and trade and family and culture and language and literature and media. But it's also less clear and easier to overlook when one is trying to trace things with precision.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-22 16:25 (UTC)(But of course, I may be wrong. And there certainly were plenty of pundits worried about what would come after Mubarak — and still are, in some circles.)
no subject
Date: 2011-05-22 16:42 (UTC)I've been much more hopeful than worried, about all of these countries, ever since this started. Particularly with Syria, where IMO there's nowhere to go but up. I mean, what exactly is there to worry about? That we'll get a new Syria that starts wars, invades neighbors to project power, always rejects peace, meddles in everyone else's affairs to try to prevent them from making peace, and funds terrorist groups all over the region? Oh, wait, that's exactly what we've had for decades now. Really, nowhere to go but up.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-22 22:49 (UTC)I’m a lot more hopeful than worried, too. There’s certainly going to be a big adjustment/learning period for the US and Israel, though. (For China, too.)