no subject
2004-03-28 20:19![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I was six or eight or so, but I’ve known monogamy didn’t feel like I was too depressed to get out of me. At the beginning, I thought it meant that those three things were all about dividing people up into the computer at home. (The userpic for this entry was taken with that camera.) We mostly talked about books and reading, and the god of soft mattresses. Maybe also some gods that were excellent (I stole a bite). It’s been a few reps backed down to only twice the weight he’d assigned me, and would encourage my worshippers to go to them as well.) It did catch that the three kinds of discrimination were basically the same reason: They’re just not food. Totally inedible. I know that by now when I’ve gotten closer to some degree; I was needy, lonely, yearning for connection but uncomfortable talking about my life in as much day-to-day detail. So at one point he was going to frame it. Typical scholargipsy. And he gave me were straightforward things I knew about myself, and/or let me know if you’d like me – which means, of course, extremely cute. I didn’t get much sleep last night with Dreaming, and volta for dinner, after which we had a fair amount of pain afterwards, and most notably because some of which I shall hopefully be fortunate enough to start investing more energy into friends again, old and new, that becomes self-reinforcing.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-28 18:05 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-28 18:18 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-28 18:46 (UTC)Dude! I'm tasting colors!
Date: 2004-03-28 23:46 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-29 04:02 (UTC)n.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-29 04:26 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-29 06:37 (UTC)Bad Jay! Two spankings. :-)
Cory
no subject
Date: 2004-03-29 10:50 (UTC)Cool!
Date: 2004-03-29 18:37 (UTC)Re: Cool!
Date: 2004-03-29 20:13 (UTC)Basically, it looks at the public entries in your journal, creates tables of the frequency of sequences of words, and generates random text with similar sequences of words. So it’s more grammatical and natural-sounding than random gibberish (“because” is likely to be followed by “of”, and “the” is likely to be followed by nouns) and it’ll even pick up unusual turns of phrase from a journal, but there’s no understanding of the text. Pretty cool, though, I think.
Here's a slightly more detailed description, and here’s information about an early Internet prank using this technique. (I heard a talk once by Rob Pike where he talked about writing the program that generated those random replies to post to the net. He’s a really funny guy.)
a wambling, indeed
Date: 2004-03-29 18:59 (UTC)