Shakespeare and lots of plumtreeblossom

[beowabbit]

On Wednesday there was another in the nifty new series of monthly davis_square gatherings that anomie666 has been organizing. I got to see surrealestate, which is always delightful, and meet some nice new people, but plumtreeblossom couldn’t make it due to rehearsal. But I did get to see her afterwards, so we had a nice little mini-date in the middle of the week.

I think it was Thursday that cathijosephine and I went out for Mexican food and margaritas in Quincy, and we had a great time and got to do some catching up.

Friday I (and cathijosephine) went to see plumtreeblossom and lots and lots of our other friends in Theatre@First’s performance of Much Ado About Nothing. It was great! I later heard somebody who’s been watching Theatre@First’s performances since they started say that this was their best performance, and I can believe it. It was done more-or-less in the round, with no stage (so the actors or at or just below the level of the audience), and with a very very minimal set and costuming. When plumtreeblossom described it to me before I saw it I confess I was a bit dubious, but wow, it really worked. All the performances were fine, most of them were good, and some of them were really good. The play flowed well, the comedic timing was good, the blocking was great (and funny), the lines were clear and delivered in a way that made the Elizabethan language very easy to follow, and I just had a great time, and so did the rest of the audience. I’m looking forward to going back on [EDIT:] closing night on Saturday, and if you get a chance (those of you who are local) and you like Shakespeare’s comedies, you should try to see one of their remaining performances.

After the show I had another lovely date with my favourite character actor. (plumtreeblossom played one of the watchmen, in drag, and did a great job! She didn’t have many lines, but she had some pretty awesome body language. I also have to mention that I had a hard time believing the person playing one of the bad guys was actually dietrich, and I kept looking at the program and trying to figure out what other character that could be!) We had a great time and stayed up far, far too late.

Sunday morning we went out for yummy brunch at Johnny D’s with a bunch of the cast and crew — yummy but slow; they were very crowded — and had a delightful time. I walked back to the church where plumtreeblossom had her call for the Sunday matinée, and as a delightful bonus bumped into docorion and mud_puppy, whom I hadn’t seen in far too long.

I had a not as productive as planned but still pretty good Sunday evening (got some laundry done, at least).

Today after work I went over to see cathijosephine and bring her some snacks, because she wasn’t feeling well. Got to overhear half of a phone call with the delightful and dearly missed ragingamazon, and got lots of kitty snuggles with Chickenfinger, who has turned into the sweetest little mellow kitty. (Poor dear used to live with two huge and playful dogs, and it’s taken her a while to recover.)

And now I’m at home and I get to go to sleep. Yay!

Comments

[beowabbit]

You've been wonderfully supportive of my theatre jones, and the best and most tolerant "theatre widower" ever. :-)

“Tolerant” seems like a really strange word here. I likes me some interesting people, and anybody who doesn’t have stuff she cares about besides spending time with me and waiting by the phone, well, would be a lot less interesting than you are, my wonderful captivating sweetie. It’s not a matter of being tolerant, your theatre and your other interests (many but not all of which I share) are part of why I love you.

One note; we don't have another Sunday matinee. We close after this Saturday night's performance, [...]

Oops! I knew that, and that’s what I meant, and I had a braino when I was typing. Fixed. In fact, if you had a Sunday performance, we wouldn’t be able to make it up to the concert in Vermont on Sunday.

My fingers typed the wrong thing, but fear not, Google (my Lord and Master, Who knoweth all) shall keep me on the right path without fail.

[plumtreeblossom.livejournal.com]

Smooches, my love! Your interests are also part of why I love you.

I actually know people who are very resentful of their partner(s)' hobbies. I've known couples who had a policy of not being allowed to participate in hobbies if the other one wasn't interested in it. Such as, if one of them loved skiing but the other wasn't into it, they had to quit skiing. I get so sad every time I hear something like "I have to quit the band, I'm getting married." I can't even IMAGINE tearing someone I love away from a persuit or hobby they enjoy. It brings them happiness, and it's part of why I love them. I wouldn't be attracted to someone who was focused only on me and the relationship(s).

So, I don't know why I used the word tolerant. What I really meant was MADE OF AWESOME!